Kurt 'Gandalf Grey' Nicklas
2009-05-22 01:55:46 UTC
Where Are the Cries of ‘Obama Lied, Jobs Died’?
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/where-are-the-cries-of-obama-lied-jobs-died/
His and his administration’s whoppers are super-sized, yet the press
still focuses on Bush.
May 21, 2009 - by Tom Blumer Page 1 of 2 Next ->
In mid-February, I identified several clear fibs and pathetic straw-
man arguments that Barack Obama and his teleprompters (not necessarily
in that order) employed in four statements he made at his first
presidential briefing and at an appearance in Elkhart, Indiana,
earlier that day.
It is now painfully clear that Obama and his apparatchiks have entered
an arena many thought Bill Clinton and his crew had all to themselves.
Admission to this very exclusive club requires the repeated ability to
get through the Three Steps of Super-Sized Lying with most of your
perceived credibility somehow still intact:
The president and his administration must have the nerve to state what
they know is an obvious falsehood without betraying any hint that he
or they realize it is false, and in a way that causes virtually all
who hear it to instinctively believe it.
Sadly, more often than not, Step 1 is enough, because the second step
requires actual follow-up by someone who heard it. That someone has to
discover, document, and prove beyond doubt that the statement or
contention made by the president or his administration is not true.
Sometimes Step 2 occurs, but the truth-teller’s proof gets little or
no attention. But if it does, the third step requires the president
and his administration to cling to their guns, so to speak, using a
variety of tactics that effectively amount to saying, “Who are you
going to believe, us or the irrefutable evidence?”
Critics can say what they will about George W. Bush’s accomplishments
or lack thereof, but if they’re honest — an unfortunately dubious
proposition — they’ll have to admit that he and his administration
almost never engaged in the three-step process to which this
administration is virtually addicted.
If you look at what the Left continues to insist are Bush’s five
biggest “lies,” you’ll realize that he and his administration never
even got to Step 1, let alone the rest of the Three Steps of Super-
Sized Lying:
Most crucially, there is the assertion that there were weapons of mass
destruction in pre-war Iraq. Critically, the Left’s claim has been and
still is that “there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”
Please note that the critics’ claim was not “no stockpiles,” “no large
caches,” or “only a few.” Their claim, frequently stated to great
applause, was that there were none, with no exceptions, no
qualifications, and no redefinitions. But the truth is that there were
WMDs in Iraq … (This brief pause has been provided so lefties can pick
their brainwashed jaws off the floor.) … Heck, I knew that in 2005.
Later evidence proved that WMDs were really, officially there. What’s
more, in November 2006, a New York Times article acknowledged the
existence of a report showing that “[Saddam] Hussein’s scientists were
on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.” As
Ed Morrissey described it at the time, “Saddam [was] far ahead of Iran
in the nuclear pursuit, … [making] it much more urgent to take some
definitive action against Saddam before he could build and deploy it.”
Oh, and I almost forgot about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake
uranium found in Iraq after Saddam was overthrown, specifically “the
stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel.”
History will have to tell us why the hapless Bush crew didn’t defend
itself against the Left’s long-since-refuted lie.
The supposedly infamous “sixteen words” (”The British government has
learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of
uranium from Africa”) that made Joe Wilson a temporary media darling
were and still are not only true, but doubly so.
Bush never said that the threat from Iraq was “imminent.”
The worst that can validly be said about the “Mission Accomplished”
celebration in May 2003 is that it was overconfident; it doesn’t
change the fact Saddam’s ouster had indeed been achieved.
Finally, the hope expressed by Dick Cheney in 2002 that “my belief is
we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators” was just that — a hopeful
prediction.
None of the above items from the Bush era qualifies as a “lie” as any
normal person who recognizes that intent is the key would define the
word.
By contrast, there is no legitimate doubt that Barack Obama and his
administration are serving up super-sized whoppers with a complete
absence of shame. Here are just a few of the more egregious:
In February, Obama, in a Peoria, Illinois, visit, said in a speech
that Caterpillar CEO Jim Owens had told him the previous day that “if
Congress passes our [stimulus] plan, this company will be able to
rehire some of the folks who were just laid off.” The truth is that
Owens “told Obama he could rehire people if a ‘responsible stimulus
bill is passed and the economy gets going again.’” Who do you believe,
Barack Obama or a CEO and the congressman who later spoke with Mr.
Owens?
On May 11, Obama and the administration claimed that executives and
representatives of major health care providers agreed that they could
wring major cost savings out of the medical system in the next 10
years on the road to a supposedly affordable government-run system
that would save the government up to $2 trillion. Within days, health
care officials denied there were any detailed promises, saying that
“they agreed to slow health spending in a more gradual way and did not
pledge specific year-by-year cuts.” Who do you believe, Obama or the
others at the conference?
On the day of government-run Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing, Obama and
his car guys told a bipartisan group of political leaders that the
bankruptcy “will not disrupt the lives of the people who work at
Chrysler or the communities that depend on it.” Those who heard it
reasonably took that statement to mean that no plants would
permanently close. At least two congresspersons issued press releases
to that effect. On May 1, government-run Chrysler announced that it
would close plants in Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Obama
lied; jobs died. Who do you believe, Team Obama or a bipartisan group
of politicians?
That the “Bush lied” crowd and the establishment media (but I repeat
myself) are so quiet while Obama’s patent falsehoods go virtually
unchallenged tells you all you need to know about whose side they are
on — and it’s not the side containing the truth.
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/where-are-the-cries-of-obama-lied-jobs-died/
His and his administration’s whoppers are super-sized, yet the press
still focuses on Bush.
May 21, 2009 - by Tom Blumer Page 1 of 2 Next ->
In mid-February, I identified several clear fibs and pathetic straw-
man arguments that Barack Obama and his teleprompters (not necessarily
in that order) employed in four statements he made at his first
presidential briefing and at an appearance in Elkhart, Indiana,
earlier that day.
It is now painfully clear that Obama and his apparatchiks have entered
an arena many thought Bill Clinton and his crew had all to themselves.
Admission to this very exclusive club requires the repeated ability to
get through the Three Steps of Super-Sized Lying with most of your
perceived credibility somehow still intact:
The president and his administration must have the nerve to state what
they know is an obvious falsehood without betraying any hint that he
or they realize it is false, and in a way that causes virtually all
who hear it to instinctively believe it.
Sadly, more often than not, Step 1 is enough, because the second step
requires actual follow-up by someone who heard it. That someone has to
discover, document, and prove beyond doubt that the statement or
contention made by the president or his administration is not true.
Sometimes Step 2 occurs, but the truth-teller’s proof gets little or
no attention. But if it does, the third step requires the president
and his administration to cling to their guns, so to speak, using a
variety of tactics that effectively amount to saying, “Who are you
going to believe, us or the irrefutable evidence?”
Critics can say what they will about George W. Bush’s accomplishments
or lack thereof, but if they’re honest — an unfortunately dubious
proposition — they’ll have to admit that he and his administration
almost never engaged in the three-step process to which this
administration is virtually addicted.
If you look at what the Left continues to insist are Bush’s five
biggest “lies,” you’ll realize that he and his administration never
even got to Step 1, let alone the rest of the Three Steps of Super-
Sized Lying:
Most crucially, there is the assertion that there were weapons of mass
destruction in pre-war Iraq. Critically, the Left’s claim has been and
still is that “there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.”
Please note that the critics’ claim was not “no stockpiles,” “no large
caches,” or “only a few.” Their claim, frequently stated to great
applause, was that there were none, with no exceptions, no
qualifications, and no redefinitions. But the truth is that there were
WMDs in Iraq … (This brief pause has been provided so lefties can pick
their brainwashed jaws off the floor.) … Heck, I knew that in 2005.
Later evidence proved that WMDs were really, officially there. What’s
more, in November 2006, a New York Times article acknowledged the
existence of a report showing that “[Saddam] Hussein’s scientists were
on the verge of building an atom bomb, as little as a year away.” As
Ed Morrissey described it at the time, “Saddam [was] far ahead of Iran
in the nuclear pursuit, … [making] it much more urgent to take some
definitive action against Saddam before he could build and deploy it.”
Oh, and I almost forgot about the 550 metric tons of yellowcake
uranium found in Iraq after Saddam was overthrown, specifically “the
stuff that can be refined into nuclear weapons or nuclear fuel.”
History will have to tell us why the hapless Bush crew didn’t defend
itself against the Left’s long-since-refuted lie.
The supposedly infamous “sixteen words” (”The British government has
learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of
uranium from Africa”) that made Joe Wilson a temporary media darling
were and still are not only true, but doubly so.
Bush never said that the threat from Iraq was “imminent.”
The worst that can validly be said about the “Mission Accomplished”
celebration in May 2003 is that it was overconfident; it doesn’t
change the fact Saddam’s ouster had indeed been achieved.
Finally, the hope expressed by Dick Cheney in 2002 that “my belief is
we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators” was just that — a hopeful
prediction.
None of the above items from the Bush era qualifies as a “lie” as any
normal person who recognizes that intent is the key would define the
word.
By contrast, there is no legitimate doubt that Barack Obama and his
administration are serving up super-sized whoppers with a complete
absence of shame. Here are just a few of the more egregious:
In February, Obama, in a Peoria, Illinois, visit, said in a speech
that Caterpillar CEO Jim Owens had told him the previous day that “if
Congress passes our [stimulus] plan, this company will be able to
rehire some of the folks who were just laid off.” The truth is that
Owens “told Obama he could rehire people if a ‘responsible stimulus
bill is passed and the economy gets going again.’” Who do you believe,
Barack Obama or a CEO and the congressman who later spoke with Mr.
Owens?
On May 11, Obama and the administration claimed that executives and
representatives of major health care providers agreed that they could
wring major cost savings out of the medical system in the next 10
years on the road to a supposedly affordable government-run system
that would save the government up to $2 trillion. Within days, health
care officials denied there were any detailed promises, saying that
“they agreed to slow health spending in a more gradual way and did not
pledge specific year-by-year cuts.” Who do you believe, Obama or the
others at the conference?
On the day of government-run Chrysler’s bankruptcy filing, Obama and
his car guys told a bipartisan group of political leaders that the
bankruptcy “will not disrupt the lives of the people who work at
Chrysler or the communities that depend on it.” Those who heard it
reasonably took that statement to mean that no plants would
permanently close. At least two congresspersons issued press releases
to that effect. On May 1, government-run Chrysler announced that it
would close plants in Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Obama
lied; jobs died. Who do you believe, Team Obama or a bipartisan group
of politicians?
That the “Bush lied” crowd and the establishment media (but I repeat
myself) are so quiet while Obama’s patent falsehoods go virtually
unchallenged tells you all you need to know about whose side they are
on — and it’s not the side containing the truth.