MSM does it again

[r wiley]

Newspaper 'suppressing' Obama link to anti-Israel professor
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=302908
Go ahead now and be a typical liberal now and say a big deal is being
made about nothing. Someone sent a video to the L.A. Times with info that
might be damaging to Obama thinking the public should know, but the paper
is suppressing it. No bias there.

So your premise is that not being zionist is a bad thing? How does the U.S.A.
benefit from Jewish rule of Palestine?

rw

[Ken Marino]

Post by r wiley

Newspaper 'suppressing' Obama link to anti-Israel professor
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=302908
Go ahead now and be a typical liberal now and say a big deal is being
made about nothing. Someone sent a video to the L.A. Times with info
that might be damaging to Obama thinking the public should know, but
the paper is suppressing it. No bias there.

So your premise is that not being zionist is a bad thing? How does the
U.S.A. benefit from Jewish rule of Palestine?
rw

Why, in almost every case, does a liberal response to a conservative
post, refuse to address the point made in the post. Liberal biased media
coverage was the purpose of the post. Because you cannot justify the
actions of the times, you don't address the question. That is SO typical
of the left.

[r wiley]

Post by Ken Marino

Post by r wiley

Newspaper 'suppressing' Obama link to anti-Israel professor
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=302908
Go ahead now and be a typical liberal now and say a big deal is being
made about nothing. Someone sent a video to the L.A. Times with info
that might be damaging to Obama thinking the public should know, but
the paper is suppressing it. No bias there.

So your premise is that not being zionist is a bad thing? How does the
U.S.A. benefit from Jewish rule of Palestine?
rw

Why, in almost every case, does a liberal response to a conservative
post, refuse to address the point made in the post. Liberal biased media
coverage was the purpose of the post. Because you cannot justify the
actions of the times, you don't address the question. That is SO typical
of the left.

If you claim that liberal media is covering up evidence that Obama is less
than totally zionist, I have no reason to dispute that. Now, how does the
USA benefit from the racist notion that the Jewish religion entitles those
who profess it to Palestine?

rw

[Geno4321]

And zionazis are wimps with wet pants.

Post by Ken Marino

Post by r wiley

Newspaper 'suppressing' Obama link to anti-Israel professor
http://www.onenewsnow.com/Election2008/Default.aspx?id=302908
Go ahead now and be a typical liberal now and say a big deal is being
made about nothing. Someone sent a video to the L.A. Times with info
that might be damaging to Obama thinking the public should know, but
the paper is suppressing it. No bias there.

So your premise is that not being zionist is a bad thing? How does the
U.S.A. benefit from Jewish rule of Palestine?
rw

Why, in almost every case, does a liberal response to a conservative
post, refuse to address the point made in the post. Liberal biased media
coverage was the purpose of the post. Because you cannot justify the
actions of the times, you don't address the question. That is SO typical
of the left.