#Putsch sqawks at Russia for invading sovereign nation

Kurt Nicklas

2008-08-14 22:12:49 UTC

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas

On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:22:45 -0400, Steve

Well Steve, why don't *you* tell us what hit the pentagon?

Errr, it was an airplane, you silly fool... A 757 to be exact.
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?...

Let's see now ..... who was the senior researcher for the Popular
Mechanics story? Could it be Benjamin Chertoff; cousin of Michael
Chertoff of Homeland Security? Ah yes; I thought so.
Look Steve, the PM "story" is a work of fiction. It has been so
thourghly discredited that it's not even useful for toilet paper
anymore. If you're going to debate, at least select some credible
sources for your position.

...and it certainly was not a missile fired from the ground and
designed to take down airplanes.

While you're at it, why don't you tell us why there was no
recognizable aircraft debris in the building?

because there WAS recognizable aircraft debris in the building....
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?...

Not a credible source. You can do much better.

Why don't you tell us
why the turbine spool (located in the debris outside the building) was
not a part used on a 757?

<LOL> More bullshit

So instead of addressing the issue, you throw stones and run. Real
solid position you got there.

That's his MO. If you clobber him soundly enough, he'll start
stalking you.
I never could get him to respond to the images of the Pentagon, before
the top stories of the impact site caved in, which showed a hole about
12 to 20 feet in diameter, far too small for a 757 to vanish into, and
absolutely no evidence of the wings impacting the adjoining areas, or
even the engines.
But then, he doesn't know how to debate. That's not what he's here
for.

Bryan, drop the pretentions. You're utterly incapable of debate
yourself. You're here to make pronouncements and villify anyone who
disagrees with your lies and distortions.

You, of course, would never vilify anyone.

That's one area you surpass me, chum, along with lying, distortion,
and dissembling.

Canyon throws your statements, claims and your laughable predictions
back in your face and you hate him for it, just like you hate me for
doing much the same.

You and Canyon are pretty much the same, except of course for the fact
that he's a child molester.

Well, I have seen Canyon "molest" you and Ricky Hanson quite often so
I suppose you have a point there. {snickers}

You've threatened us both with legal action. I'm still waiting for
your "lawyers".

I notice you kind of backed away a bit on the stalking.

Remind me again what prompted you to threaten legal action. Was it
when
I pointed out how you'd lied repeatedly about being able to vote or
was
it when I reprinted your frequent written fantasies about the deaths
of people
who dare to disagree with you?

You're really not fooling anyone, you know. Even the luckers know
what's going on with you.

I certainly hope so. And I'm sure they've got your number.

I hope they do.

Say, isn't it time for you to celebrate Steve's death again?

Say, isn't it time for you to retract and apologize for your lie about
Tucker Carlson interviewing me in connection with his suicide?

Remember, you're doing it for Jesus, and to show me how Americans are
morally superior.

Lots of Americans are morally superior to you, Bryan.