Discussion:
#Coulter: AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
(too old to reply)
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-27 08:02:07 UTC
Permalink
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008

http://www.anncoulter.com/

The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.

In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright, 'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"

During one of the Democratic primary debates, Hillary Clinton was
hissed for mentioning Syrian national Rezko, and during another, ABC
moderator George Stephanopoulos nearly lost his career for asking
Obama one question about William Ayers.

In the past week, TV anchors have taken to claiming that Obama
"refuted" John McCain's statement that Obama launched his political
career at the home of former Weather Underground leader Ayers.

No, Obama "denied" it; he didn't "refute" it. If "denying" something
is the same as "refuting" it, then maybe the establishment media can
quit harping on Palin's qualifications to be president, since she too
"refuted" that by denying it.

Back before the media realized it needed to lie about Obama launching
his political career at Ayers' house, the Los Angeles Times provided
an eyewitness account from a liberal who attended the event.

"When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous
little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-
minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him --
introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since
sliced bread."

The Times has now stripped this item from its Web page, but the great
blogger Patterico has preserved it for posterity on his Web page.

Obama's glib remark that "Bill Ayers is a professor of education in
Chicago; 40 years ago when I was 8 years old he engaged in despicable
acts with a domestic group. I have roundly denounced those attacks" --
doesn't answer anything.

First of all, the fact that Ayers is a professor of education proves
only one thing: He is dumber than any person without an education
degree.

Ayers is such an imbecile, we ought to be amazed that he's teaching at
a university -- even when you consider that it's an ed school --
except all former violent radicals end up teaching. Roughly 80 percent
of former Weathermen are full college professors -- 99 percent if you
don't include the ones killed in shoot-outs with the police or in
prison -- i.e., not yet pardoned by a Democratic president.

Any other profession would have banned a person like Ayers.
Universities not only accept former domestic terrorists, but also move
them to the front of the line. In addition to Ayers, among those once
on the FBI's most-wanted list who ended up in cushy college teaching
positions are Bernardine Dohrn (Northwestern University), Mark Rudd (a
junior college in New Mexico) and Angela Davis (History of
Consciousness Department, University of California at Santa Cruz).

While others were hard at work on Ph.D.s, Susan Rosenberg was
conspiring to kill cops and blow up buildings, and was assembling
massive caches of explosives. This put her on the fast track for a
teaching position at Hamilton College!

Despite having absolutely no qualifications to teach, having earned
only a master's degree in "writing" through a correspondence course,
Rosenberg was offered a position at Hamilton within a few years of
President Clinton pardoning her in 2001, releasing her from a 58-year
prison sentence for participating in the murder of cops and possessing
more than 700 pounds of explosives.

But Obama thinks it's a selling point to say that Ayers is a college
professor.

Hundreds of college professors have signed a letter vouching for
Ayers, which would be like Lester Maddox producing a letter from
George Wallace assuring us that Maddox is a respected member of the
community. No, really, I've got the letter right here!

The media keep citing the fact that the money Obama and Ayers
distributed to idiotic left-wing causes came -- as The New York Times
put it -- "from Walter H. Annenberg, the billionaire publisher and
philanthropist and President Richard M. Nixon's ambassador to the
United Kingdom."

Great Republican though he was, Walter Annenberg died in 2002. The
money came from the Annenberg Foundation, which, like all foundations,
distributes money to projects that its founder would despise. John
Kerry ran for president on the late John Heinz's money. That didn't
mean Republican Heinz was endorsing Kerry.

As John O'Sullivan says, any foundation that is not explicitly right-
wing will become a radical left-wing organization within a few years.
It could be the Association of University Women, the American
Association of Retired People, the American Rose Growers, the
Foundation for the Study of Railroad Engineers or the Choral Society
of Newport Beach.

Left-wing radicals swarm to free foundation money, where they can give
gigantic grants to one another and they will never have to do a day's
work. That's exactly what Obama and Ayers did with Annenberg's money.

None of the Annenberg money went to schoolchildren. It went to Ayers'
left-wing crank friends to write moronic papers that we hope no one
ever reads.

Instead of teaching students reading and writing, Ayers thinks they
should be taught to rebel against America's "imperialist" social
structure. In 2006, Ayers was in Venezuela praising communist dictator
Hugo Chavez, saying, "We share the belief that education is the motor-
force of revolution."

He has backed a line of schoolbooks such as one titled "Teaching
Science for Social Justice."

Forget about Ayers' domestic terrorism when Obama "was 8 years old."
Does he agree with Ayers' idiot ideas right
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-27 12:33:52 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism , Kurt
Post by Kurt Nicklas
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008
http://www.anncoulter.com/
The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.
In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright,
You mean other than the weeks of showing the video?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"
Oh, no, an angry Michelle? How can we have an angry Black person. Now
that is scary.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
During one of the Democratic primary debates, Hillary Clinton was
hissed for mentioning Syrian national Rezko, and during another, ABC
moderator George Stephanopoulos nearly lost his career for asking
Obama one question about William Ayers.
Ann is funny.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
In the past week, TV anchors have taken to claiming that Obama
"refuted" John McCain's statement that Obama launched his political
career at the home of former Weather Underground leader Ayers.
No, Obama "denied" it; he didn't "refute" it. If "denying" something
is the same as "refuting" it, then maybe the establishment media can
quit harping on Palin's qualifications to be president, since she too
"refuted" that by denying it.
It was refuted by the people who did help Obama launch his campaign.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Back before the media realized it needed to lie about Obama launching
his political career at Ayers' house, the Los Angeles Times provided
an eyewitness account from a liberal who attended the event.
"When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous
little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-
minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him --
introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since
sliced bread."
The Times has now stripped this item from its Web page, but the great
blogger Patterico has preserved it for posterity on his Web page.
They stripped it because the people who did it before that said so.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Obama's glib remark that "Bill Ayers is a professor of education in
Chicago; 40 years ago when I was 8 years old he engaged in despicable
acts with a domestic group. I have roundly denounced those attacks" --
doesn't answer anything.
First of all, the fact that Ayers is a professor of education proves
only one thing: He is dumber than any person without an education
degree.
Yet the right-wing Annenberg Foundation gave money to a group he was
promoting.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Ayers is such an imbecile, we ought to be amazed that he's teaching at
a university -- even when you consider that it's an ed school --
except all former violent radicals end up teaching. Roughly 80 percent
of former Weathermen are full college professors -- 99 percent if you
don't include the ones killed in shoot-outs with the police or in
prison -- i.e., not yet pardoned by a Democratic president.
More funny stuff. Do you buy any of this Kurt or are you just
trolling?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Any other profession would have banned a person like Ayers.
Nice syndicalist fascism you have there.

[snip]
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hundreds of college professors have signed a letter vouching for
Ayers, which would be like Lester Maddox producing a letter from
George Wallace assuring us that Maddox is a respected member of the
community. No, really, I've got the letter right here!
Wow, even for Ann that is amazing. She tries to draw an analogy
between being racist and being a college professor. Kurt, do you have
the same contempt for education?

[snip]
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Great Republican though he was, Walter Annenberg died in 2002. The
money came from the Annenberg Foundation, which, like all foundations,
distributes money to projects that its founder would despise.
All of them?

[snip]
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 00:14:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism , Kurt
Post by Kurt Nicklas
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008
http://www.anncoulter.com/
The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.
In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright,
You mean other than the weeks of showing the video?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"
Oh, no, an angry Michelle? How can we have an angry Black person. Now
that is scary.
It is if she wants to inhabit the WH.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
During one of the Democratic primary debates, Hillary Clinton was
hissed for mentioning Syrian national Rezko, and during another, ABC
moderator George Stephanopoulos nearly lost his career for asking
Obama one question about William Ayers.
Ann is funny.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
In the past week, TV anchors have taken to claiming that Obama
"refuted" John McCain's statement that Obama launched his political
career at the home of former Weather Underground leader Ayers.
No, Obama "denied" it; he didn't "refute" it. If "denying" something
is the same as "refuting" it, then maybe the establishment media can
quit harping on Palin's qualifications to be president, since she too
"refuted" that by denying it.
It was refuted by the people who did help Obama launch his campaign.
No, it wasn't.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Back before the media realized it needed to lie about Obama launching
his political career at Ayers' house, the Los Angeles Times provided
an eyewitness account from a liberal who attended the event.
"When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous
little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-
minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him --
introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since
sliced bread."
The Times has now stripped this item from its Web page, but the great
blogger Patterico has preserved it for posterity on his Web page.
They stripped it because the people who did it before that said so.
What is that supposed to mean?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Obama's glib remark that "Bill Ayers is a professor of education in
Chicago; 40 years ago when I was 8 years old he engaged in despicable
acts with a domestic group. I have roundly denounced those attacks" --
doesn't answer anything.
First of all, the fact that Ayers is a professor of education proves
only one thing: He is dumber than any person without an education
degree.
Yet the right-wing Annenberg Foundation gave money to a group he was
promoting.
Walter Annenberg may have been a conservative but his Foundation isn't.

------

You don't really have many objections to this Coulter piece, do you?
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-28 00:33:42 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:14:17 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism , Kurt
Post by Kurt Nicklas
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008
http://www.anncoulter.com/
The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.
In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright,
You mean other than the weeks of showing the video?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"
Oh, no, an angry Michelle? How can we have an angry Black person. Now
that is scary.
It is if she wants to inhabit the WH.
Yep, can't have an angry black person in the White House.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
During one of the Democratic primary debates, Hillary Clinton was
hissed for mentioning Syrian national Rezko, and during another, ABC
moderator George Stephanopoulos nearly lost his career for asking
Obama one question about William Ayers.
Ann is funny.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
In the past week, TV anchors have taken to claiming that Obama
"refuted" John McCain's statement that Obama launched his political
career at the home of former Weather Underground leader Ayers.
No, Obama "denied" it; he didn't "refute" it. If "denying" something
is the same as "refuting" it, then maybe the establishment media can
quit harping on Palin's qualifications to be president, since she too
"refuted" that by denying it.
It was refuted by the people who did help Obama launch his campaign.
No, it wasn't.
Yes, it was. Ayer was not the first, he was a follower.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Back before the media realized it needed to lie about Obama launching
his political career at Ayers' house, the Los Angeles Times provided
an eyewitness account from a liberal who attended the event.
"When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous
little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-
minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him --
introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since
sliced bread."
The Times has now stripped this item from its Web page, but the great
blogger Patterico has preserved it for posterity on his Web page.
They stripped it because the people who did it before that said so.
What is that supposed to mean?
They removed the false information as they got better information. The
people who did launch Obama's political career said they did it.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Obama's glib remark that "Bill Ayers is a professor of education in
Chicago; 40 years ago when I was 8 years old he engaged in despicable
acts with a domestic group. I have roundly denounced those attacks" --
doesn't answer anything.
First of all, the fact that Ayers is a professor of education proves
only one thing: He is dumber than any person without an education
degree.
Yet the right-wing Annenberg Foundation gave money to a group he was
promoting.
Walter Annenberg may have been a conservative but his Foundation isn't.
------
You don't really have many objections to this Coulter piece, do you?
I did not even bother to try. Ann is a comedienne, not a rational
pundit. There was nothing of sufficient importance to bother refuting.
It was too silly, too late.
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 00:39:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:14:17 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism , Kurt
Post by Kurt Nicklas
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008
http://www.anncoulter.com/
The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.
In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright,
You mean other than the weeks of showing the video?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"
Oh, no, an angry Michelle? How can we have an angry Black person. Now
that is scary.
It is if she wants to inhabit the WH.
Yep, can't have an angry black person in the White House.
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
During one of the Democratic primary debates, Hillary Clinton was
hissed for mentioning Syrian national Rezko, and during another, ABC
moderator George Stephanopoulos nearly lost his career for asking
Obama one question about William Ayers.
Ann is funny.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
In the past week, TV anchors have taken to claiming that Obama
"refuted" John McCain's statement that Obama launched his political
career at the home of former Weather Underground leader Ayers.
No, Obama "denied" it; he didn't "refute" it. If "denying" something
is the same as "refuting" it, then maybe the establishment media can
quit harping on Palin's qualifications to be president, since she too
"refuted" that by denying it.
It was refuted by the people who did help Obama launch his campaign.
No, it wasn't.
Yes, it was. Ayer was not the first, he was a follower.
Nope.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Back before the media realized it needed to lie about Obama launching
his political career at Ayers' house, the Los Angeles Times provided
an eyewitness account from a liberal who attended the event.
"When I first met Barack Obama, he was giving a standard, innocuous
little talk in the living room of those two legends-in-their-own-
minds, Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. They were launching him --
introducing him to the Hyde Park community as the best thing since
sliced bread."
The Times has now stripped this item from its Web page, but the great
blogger Patterico has preserved it for posterity on his Web page.
They stripped it because the people who did it before that said so.
What is that supposed to mean?
They removed the false information as they got better information. The
people who did launch Obama's political career said they did it.
They removed the information when they got hastled by the Hussein
campaign.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Obama's glib remark that "Bill Ayers is a professor of education in
Chicago; 40 years ago when I was 8 years old he engaged in despicable
acts with a domestic group. I have roundly denounced those attacks" --
doesn't answer anything.
First of all, the fact that Ayers is a professor of education proves
only one thing: He is dumber than any person without an education
degree.
Yet the right-wing Annenberg Foundation gave money to a group he was
promoting.
Walter Annenberg may have been a conservative but his Foundation isn't.
Lack of response noted.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
------
You don't really have many objections to this Coulter piece, do you?
I did not even bother to try. Ann is a comedienne, not a rational
pundit. There was nothing of sufficient importance to bother refuting.
No, you can't refute it so you pretend it doesn't need it. It's just
another variation on sour grapes.
Post by Matt Silberstein
It was too silly, too late.
Grow up.
DanielSan
2008-10-28 00:43:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:14:17 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:02:07 -0700 (PDT), in alt.atheism , Kurt
Post by Kurt Nicklas
AYERS: RADICAL LOON WHEN OBAMA WAS ONLY 47
October 22, 2008
http://www.anncoulter.com/
The media are acting as if they completely and fully vetted Obama
during the Democratic primaries and that's why they are entitled to
send teams of researchers into Alaska to analyze Sarah Palin's every
expense report.
In fact, the mainstream media did no vetting. They seem to have all
agreed, "OK, none of us will get into this business with Jeremiah
Wright,
You mean other than the weeks of showing the video?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
'Tony' Rezko, Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and everyone's
impression of an angry Michelle Obama on 'The Jerry Springer Show.'"
Oh, no, an angry Michelle? How can we have an angry Black person. Now
that is scary.
It is if she wants to inhabit the WH.
Yep, can't have an angry black person in the White House.
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
--
******************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* It has been said that Jesus died on a Friday and *
* was resurrected on a Sunday. It is not so much *
* that Jesus died for our sins, as he had a very *
* bad weekend for them. *
******************************************************
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 00:47:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
DanielSan
2008-10-28 00:59:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?





--
******************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* It has been said that Jesus died on a Friday and *
* was resurrected on a Sunday. It is not so much *
* that Jesus died for our sins, as he had a very *
* bad weekend for them. *
******************************************************
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 01:10:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>

So?

Do you have a point??
DanielSan
2008-10-28 01:17:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
(Restoration of snipped text)

http://youtu.be/k0cNM3-mL_0
http://youtu.be/-CazKanlYDg
http://youtu.be/Kj7HbqwZwRM
http://youtu.be/kHcPXfgD4jM
http://youtu.be/fAyK-enrF1g
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well. You claimed that we
can't have an angry person in the White House and McCain's rage is epic.

(Restoration of newsgroup snipped from "Followup-To:" header)
--
******************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* It has been said that Jesus died on a Friday and *
* was resurrected on a Sunday. It is not so much *
* that Jesus died for our sins, as he had a very *
* bad weekend for them. *
******************************************************
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 09:37:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?

Why should I pay any attention at all to what you have to say?
Can you answer that?
DanielSan
2008-10-28 12:32:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies, whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why should I pay any attention at all to what you have to say?
Can you answer that?
I'm sorry, but I guess you'll never believe your own lying eyes.
--
******************************************************
* DanielSan -- alt.atheism #2226 *
*----------------------------------------------------*
* It has been said that Jesus died on a Friday and *
* was resurrected on a Sunday. It is not so much *
* that Jesus died for our sins, as he had a very *
* bad weekend for them. *
******************************************************
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 15:32:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?

Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why should I pay any attention at all to what you have to say?
Can you answer that?
I'm sorry, but I guess you'll never believe your own lying eyes.
Lack of any sort of answer to my question duly noted.
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-28 15:48:52 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:32:09 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things. I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism. If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Light is physical.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified? But I do think that the flash cards I
have seen accompanying the Obama interviews does distort.

[snip]
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-28 22:40:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:32:09 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things.
How do you know they link to the same thing?

Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?

Oh, that's right....you're an atheist.
Post by Matt Silberstein
I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism.
So what?
Post by Matt Silberstein
If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Who made you the referee?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Light is physical.
Thanks for the magnificent insight, Einstein.....

{Sheesh}
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified?
I'm saying they don't constitute proof of anything.
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-29 01:48:17 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:40:27 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:32:09 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things.
How do you know they link to the same thing?
I don't know, but I have seen two items floating around with lots of
different links to them.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
My statement was correct, read it again.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Oh, that's right....you're an atheist.
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism.
So what?
So if you want to make your case you will have to try something.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Who made you the referee?
Ok, don't, I don't care. I thought you were trying to convince people.
I was wrong.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Light is physical.
Thanks for the magnificent insight, Einstein.....
You asked the question, it is not my problem if the answer was
obvious.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
{Sheesh}
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified?
I'm saying they don't constitute proof of anything.
Do you have a consistent standard of proof?
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-29 09:53:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:40:27 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:32:09 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things.
How do you know they link to the same thing?
I don't know, but I have seen two items floating around with lots of
different links to them.
"Two items" out of 3,000,000, huh? "Lots", huh?

LOL
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
My statement was correct, read it again.
But why should I?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Oh, that's right....you're an atheist.
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
So you're not an atheist?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism.
So what?
So if you want to make your case you will have to try something.
Why should I make a case to you?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Who made you the referee?
Ok, don't, I don't care.
Yes, I believe you do. Don't lie.
Post by Matt Silberstein
I thought you were trying to convince people.
I was wrong.
Why should I?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Light is physical.
Thanks for the magnificent insight, Einstein.....
You asked the question, it is not my problem if the answer was
obvious.
It wasn't.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
{Sheesh}
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified?
I'm saying they don't constitute proof of anything.
Do you have a consistent standard of proof?
Why do you ask?
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-29 21:34:01 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:53:46 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 18:40:27 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:32:09 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things.
How do you know they link to the same thing?
I don't know, but I have seen two items floating around with lots of
different links to them.
"Two items" out of 3,000,000, huh? "Lots", huh?
LOL
You missed the "lots of links" part. Now if you have something else to
show, do it. But bragging about 3M google hits (and calling them links
no less) is not actual evidence.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
My statement was correct, read it again.
But why should I?
So you would stop saying otherwise.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Oh, that's right....you're an atheist.
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
So you're not an atheist?
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism.
So what?
So if you want to make your case you will have to try something.
Why should I make a case to you?
Then don't. I thought you had a point to make. If I was wrong I am
sorry.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Who made you the referee?
Ok, don't, I don't care.
Yes, I believe you do. Don't lie.
You are entitled to your beliefs. I will have fun either way.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I thought you were trying to convince people.
I was wrong.
Why should I?
Then don't.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Light is physical.
Thanks for the magnificent insight, Einstein.....
You asked the question, it is not my problem if the answer was
obvious.
It wasn't.
Then you are welcome.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
{Sheesh}
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified?
I'm saying they don't constitute proof of anything.
Do you have a consistent standard of proof?
Why do you ask?
So I can compare you statements here to elsewhere. If you don't try
for consistency then I won't bother.
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-30 11:17:23 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Wed, 29 Oct 2008 05:53:46 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Lots of links to the same thing is not lots of things.
How do you know they link to the same thing?
I don't know, but I have seen two items floating around with lots of
different links to them.
"Two items" out of 3,000,000, huh? "Lots", huh?
LOL
You missed the "lots of links" part.
That's what I was laughing at, genius!
Post by Matt Silberstein
Now if you have something else to
show, do it. But bragging about 3M google hits (and calling them links
no less) is not actual evidence.
Which one of those hits on google is not represented by a link?

You don't know what you're talking about here,do you?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
My statement was correct, read it again.
But why should I?
So you would stop saying otherwise.
Why?
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Oh, that's right....you're an atheist.
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
So you're not an atheist?
Why do you continue to make statements you can't prove?
Failure to answer my question duly noted.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I have listened
several times to the various interviews and I see no socialism.
So what?
So if you want to make your case you will have to try something.
Why should I make a case to you?
Then don't. I thought you had a point to make. If I was wrong I am
sorry.
You're very sorry.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
If you
have a specific link to promote, do so.
Who made you the referee?
Ok, don't, I don't care.
Yes, I believe you do. Don't lie.
You are entitled to your beliefs. I will have fun either way.
Not as much fun as I'm having......
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
I thought you were trying to convince people.
I was wrong.
Why should I?
Then don't.
Thanks.
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Matt Silberstein
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Are you claiming that the videos of McCain's performance in the
debates was somehow falsified?
I'm saying they don't constitute proof of anything.
Do you have a consistent standard of proof?
Why do you ask?
So I can compare you statements here to elsewhere. If you don't try
for consistency then I won't bother.
Why should I prove anything for you?
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-30 13:43:15 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:17:23 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
<***@bellsouth.net> in <***@news.aioe.org>
wrote:

[snip]
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why should I prove anything for you?
You don't need to. We are going to win, you are going to lose.
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-30 22:14:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Matt Silberstein
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 07:17:23 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
[snip]
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Why should I prove anything for you?
You don't need to. We are going to win, you are going to lose.
And yet you have "Kick me, I'm a loser" written all over you.

{snickers}

AZ Nomad
2008-10-28 16:04:10 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
<snip>
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
So?
Do you have a point??
I thought those videos made my point quite well.
What's your point? You go to a site, do a search and produce
some urls. So what? I go to google, search "Obama is a socialist",
get 3 million plus hits and !PRESTO! - using your method -
Hussein is a socialist, right?
No, because it's based on lies,
You've seen these 3 million links to know they are based on lies?
Argument by defective google query? Oh pulleeze.
Let me try one: "Kurt is an idiot"
1.4 million hits. Proves some don't it. Have you checked them all?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
whereas there is physical evidence of
McCain's rage directly in the videos posted.
What sort of "physical evidence" could be in a video?
Are you so stupid that you don't think a video can't be fasified?
Yeah, that's the ticket!
And anybody who had an unadulterated video was secreted away.
Matt Silberstein
2008-10-28 11:36:39 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:47:28 -0400, in alt.atheism , Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by DanielSan
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Yep, can't have an angry person in the White House.
So, you're going to vote against McCain?
Why do you say that?
Do you not see just a touch of anger in McCain? Have you not read one
or a score of distinct reports of people talking about McCain temper?
--
Matt Silberstein

Do something today about the Darfur Genocide

http://www.beawitness.org
http://www.darfurgenocide.org
http://www.savedarfur.org

"Darfur: A Genocide We can Stop"
Loading...