Discussion:
Black Obama Donor ordered Big Brother probe of Joe the Plumber
(too old to reply)
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-30 22:35:19 UTC
Permalink
In article <T5-***@earthlink.com>, valinor20
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information, but if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no. It was tried immediately when the colonists landed. It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth, Ricky.

Socialism uses the power of government to redistribute it to suit the
politicians and bureaucrats in power.

Free enterprise allows individuals to exercise their individual
creativity to CREATE business and products. Socialism - and socialists -
empower GOVERNMENT to use FORCE to redistribute the wealth created by
individuals to suit GOVERNMENT dictates.

Now you can see why Hussein never talks about empowering individuals.
Now you can see why it's in Hussein's interests to highlight suffering
people. Without suffering people, there would be no people to be
dependent on government. Without dependents, socialists are useless.

Socialists don't want individuals to be empowered because it detracts
from their own power.

If you weren't so stupid, you'd know that.
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-30 22:38:10 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2008"
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that wants to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh?  You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
================================
We'd prefer that you learn what the words mean, but that's obviously too
much to hope for.
But the tactics used in the attempt to discredit Joe the Plumber were
classic Stalinist weren't they? Unlike the rest of you fools I've
actually studied Marx. Your candidate is a Marxist. He does believe
that the working classes are exploited by the multi-national
corporations. And that to level the playing field he must redistribute
the wealth. The dirty little secret is that all those billionares and
millionares simply don't have enough money to fund all the giveaways
Obama promised to the world's largest middle class. We could rape
them all and it still wouldn't pay for the welfare he promised you.
And you still discount the power of the racist democrats. They will
destroy Obama at the polls.
LOL You ignorant, nutless, losing, pathetic, sh4t-stained retard
posting dog f%cking monkey. Is that all you got? You "actually
studied Marx?"
Typical hate-filled Hussein supporter......

Don't drool on your chin, loon.
Slime Bucket McCain
2008-10-30 23:16:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2008"
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that wants to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
================================
We'd prefer that you learn what the words mean, but that's obviously too
much to hope for.
But the tactics used in the attempt to discredit Joe the Plumber were
classic Stalinist weren't they? Unlike the rest of you fools I've
actually studied Marx. Your candidate is a Marxist. He does believe
that the working classes are exploited by the multi-national
corporations. And that to level the playing field he must redistribute
the wealth. The dirty little secret is that all those billionares and
millionares simply don't have enough money to fund all the giveaways
Obama promised to the world's largest middle class. We could rape
them all and it still wouldn't pay for the welfare he promised you.
And you still discount the power of the racist democrats. They will
destroy Obama at the polls.
LOL You ignorant, nutless, losing, pathetic, sh4t-stained retard
posting dog f%cking monkey. Is that all you got? You "actually
studied Marx?"
Typical hate-filled Hussein supporter......
Don't drool on your chin, loon.
Your desperation is fun to watch :)
Kurt Nicklas
2008-10-31 00:19:55 UTC
Permalink
In article <gedfbs$dc0$***@registered.motzarella.org>, ***@sleaze.com
says...
Post by Slime Bucket McCain
Post by Kurt Nicklas
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2008"
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that wants to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
================================
We'd prefer that you learn what the words mean, but that's obviously too
much to hope for.
But the tactics used in the attempt to discredit Joe the Plumber were
classic Stalinist weren't they? Unlike the rest of you fools I've
actually studied Marx. Your candidate is a Marxist. He does believe
that the working classes are exploited by the multi-national
corporations. And that to level the playing field he must redistribute
the wealth. The dirty little secret is that all those billionares and
millionares simply don't have enough money to fund all the giveaways
Obama promised to the world's largest middle class. We could rape
them all and it still wouldn't pay for the welfare he promised you.
And you still discount the power of the racist democrats. They will
destroy Obama at the polls.
LOL You ignorant, nutless, losing, pathetic, sh4t-stained retard
posting dog f%cking monkey. Is that all you got? You "actually
studied Marx?"
Typical hate-filled Hussein supporter......
Don't drool on your chin, loon.
Your desperation is fun to watch :)
That you find it necessary to hide behind an ever-expanding array of
hatefilled anonymous nyms shows just how afraid you are.
4802 Dead
2008-10-31 02:01:34 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:19:55 -0400, Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
says...
Post by Slime Bucket McCain
Post by Kurt Nicklas
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:05:36 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2008"
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that wants to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
================================
We'd prefer that you learn what the words mean, but that's obviously too
much to hope for.
But the tactics used in the attempt to discredit Joe the Plumber were
classic Stalinist weren't they? Unlike the rest of you fools I've
actually studied Marx. Your candidate is a Marxist. He does believe
that the working classes are exploited by the multi-national
corporations. And that to level the playing field he must redistribute
the wealth. The dirty little secret is that all those billionares and
millionares simply don't have enough money to fund all the giveaways
Obama promised to the world's largest middle class. We could rape
them all and it still wouldn't pay for the welfare he promised you.
And you still discount the power of the racist democrats. They will
destroy Obama at the polls.
LOL You ignorant, nutless, losing, pathetic, sh4t-stained retard
posting dog f%cking monkey. Is that all you got? You "actually
studied Marx?"
Typical hate-filled Hussein supporter......
Don't drool on your chin, loon.
Your desperation is fun to watch :)
That you find it necessary to hide behind an ever-expanding array of
hatefilled anonymous nyms shows just how afraid you are.
Billary can't help it. Like most hate-filled right wingers, he's a
coward.
--

Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition,
as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of
innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.
-- John McCain, in the Sept/Oct 2008 issue of Contingencies, the magazine of the
American Academy of Actuaries.
Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
For the finest in liberal/leftist commentary,
http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
For news feed (free, 10-20 articles a day)
Zepps_News-***@yahoogroups.com
For essays (donations accepted, 2 articles/week)
Zepps_essays-***@yahoogroups.com
a.a. #2211 -- Bryan Zepp Jamieson
Steve
2008-10-30 22:49:22 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:35:19 -0400, Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information, but if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no. It was tried immediately when the colonists landed. It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth, Ricky.
Socialism uses the power of government to redistribute it to suit the
politicians and bureaucrats in power.
Free enterprise allows individuals to exercise their individual
creativity to CREATE business and products. Socialism - and socialists -
empower GOVERNMENT to use FORCE to redistribute the wealth created by
individuals to suit GOVERNMENT dictates.
Now you can see why Hussein never talks about empowering individuals.
Now you can see why it's in Hussein's interests to highlight suffering
people. Without suffering people, there would be no people to be
dependent on government. Without dependents, socialists are useless.
Socialists don't want individuals to be empowered because it detracts
from their own power.
If you weren't so stupid, you'd know that.
There are two kinds of socialists.. there are the power socialists and
then there are the little socialist moron like we see here on Usenet..
Big power socialists like George Soros aren't really socialists at
all.. He has no intention of ever seeing his income reduced to bare
necessities of that which he needs nor his work load up to that which
he can do.. But he does love the power over the little morons who
follow him....

Justice is when you get exactly what you deserve.
--Neal Bortz
a***@yahoo.com
2008-10-31 05:40:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
Capitalism CREATES wealth, Ricky.
In this administraton it does it for those who are GREEDY and already
wealthy
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Socialism uses the power of government to redistribute it to suit the
politicians and bureaucrats in power.
Yea as is this dysfunctional government, it doesn't work does it?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Free enterprise allows individuals to exercise their individual
creativity to CREATE business and products. Socialism - and socialists -
empower GOVERNMENT to use FORCE to redistribute the wealth created by
individuals to suit GOVERNMENT dictates.
You described your dysfunctional republican government to a t.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Now you can see why Hussein never talks about empowering individuals.
Yet he does that all the fucking time, right, bitch?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Now you can see why it's in Hussein's interests to highlight suffering
people.
No thats your fucking warped vision your seeing. Tthinking people
don't see what isn't there.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Without suffering people, there would be no people to be
dependent on government. Without dependents, socialists are useless.
Suffering, we lost over $20,000 under your suffering dysfunctional
government and it fagot supporters.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Socialists don't want individuals to be empowered because it detracts
from their own power.
You described your DYSFUNCTIONAL government, we have nothing to do
with that.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
If you weren't so stupid, you'd know that.
You would vote for this cocksucker again, huh, bitch?

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
a***@yahoo.com
2008-10-31 05:40:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
Capitalism CREATES wealth, Ricky.
In this administraton it does it for those who are GREEDY and already
wealthy
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Socialism uses the power of government to redistribute it to suit the
politicians and bureaucrats in power.
Yea as is this dysfunctional government, it doesn't work does it?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Free enterprise allows individuals to exercise their individual
creativity to CREATE business and products. Socialism - and socialists -
empower GOVERNMENT to use FORCE to redistribute the wealth created by
individuals to suit GOVERNMENT dictates.
You described your dysfunctional republican government to a t.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Now you can see why Hussein never talks about empowering individuals.
Yet he does that all the fucking time, right, bitch?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Now you can see why it's in Hussein's interests to highlight suffering
people.
No thats your fucking warped vision your seeing. Tthinking people
don't see what isn't there.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Without suffering people, there would be no people to be
dependent on government. Without dependents, socialists are useless.
Suffering, we lost over $20,000 under your suffering dysfunctional
government and it fagot supporters.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Socialists don't want individuals to be empowered because it detracts
from their own power.
You described your DYSFUNCTIONAL government, we have nothing to do
with that.
Post by Kurt Nicklas
If you weren't so stupid, you'd know that.
You would vote for this cocksucker again, huh, bitch?

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't
care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-01 01:20:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information, but if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no.  It was tried immediately when the colonists landed.  It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth,
And redistributes it, Dickless.
The economic processes at work in capitalism cause wealth to be
created and distributed, Ricky. What Hussein and other Leftwingers
propose is forced
restribution by government fiat.

You know that and fear to have it understood, Rick. That's why you
deleted
most of what I wrote.

But, too bad for you, I'll restore it here and you'll just have to try
to
delete it once again.

After all, the Left hates to have the truth told about what they truly
want for the country, Rick.

And win or lose we WILL continue to speak the truth.

Count on it.

Restored text:

Capitalism CREATES wealth, Ricky.

Socialism uses the power of government to redistribute it to suit the
politicians and bureaucrats in power.

Free enterprise allows individuals to exercise their individual
creativity to CREATE business and products. Socialism - and socialists
-
empower GOVERNMENT to use FORCE to redistribute the wealth created by
individuals to suit GOVERNMENT dictates.

Now you can see why Hussein never talks about empowering individuals.
Now you can see why it's in Hussein's interests to highlight
suffering
people. Without suffering people, there would be no people to be
dependent on government. Without dependents, socialists are useless.


Socialists don't want individuals to be empowered because it detracts
from their own power.


If you weren't so stupid, you'd know that.
Gandalf Grey
2008-11-01 02:30:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist' means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information,
but
if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no. It was tried immediately when the colonists landed. It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth,
And redistributes it, Dickless.
% The economic processes at work in capitalism cause wealth to be
created and distributed,

That's right, Dickless....REdistributed.

Welcome to the world of the non-moronic, Dickless.

How it must suck to be you.
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-01 10:32:08 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@earthlink.com>, valinor20
@gmail.com says...
Post by Gandalf Grey
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist'
means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information,
but
if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no. It was tried immediately when the colonists landed. It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth,
And redistributes it, Dickless.
% The economic processes at work in capitalism cause wealth to be
created and distributed,
That's right, Dickless....REdistributed.
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.

That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.

Get used to hearing it.

{By the way, thanks much for your post in support of alt.impeach.clinton
- snickers}
Steve
2008-11-01 10:39:05 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 06:32:08 -0400, Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
Post by Gandalf Grey
Post by Kurt Nicklas
@gmail.com says...
None of which changes the fact that Obama is a socialist that
wants
to
spread the wealth.
Another rightard who doesn't know what the word 'socialist'
means
parades his ignorance for all to see.
Oh? You prefer I use the word marxist instead?
You obviously don't the know the meaning of either. For extra
points,
who came up with the idea of progressive taxation.
Oh I don't know....Marx...Engels maybe.
============================
Try the republican icon, Adam Smith in the book "The Wealth of Nations"
I know: books are locked boxes where we keep secret information,
but
if
you'd actually learn to read, you might discover all sorts of amazing
stuff.
And that makes the idea of spreading the wealth any less
socialistic....how?
======================================
1. Redistribution of wealth is not socialistic.
% Sure it is.
Not according to every capitalist who ever wrote anything on the subject.
2. Redistribution of wealth is the cornerstone of American capitalism,
American government and American history.
% Uh...no. It was tried immediately when the colonists landed. It was
a colossal failure and led to capitalism.
And capitalism is the redistribution of wealth.
Capitalism CREATES wealth,
And redistributes it, Dickless.
% The economic processes at work in capitalism cause wealth to be
created and distributed,
That's right, Dickless....REdistributed.
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
It's only to be expected that Ricky Hanson would want those welfare
checks that Obammy promises... He's hoping to be able to move out of
that tiny little crackerbox home he lives in someday and every little
bit helps...
Post by Kurt Nicklas
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Get used to hearing it.
{By the way, thanks much for your post in support of alt.impeach.clinton
- snickers}
Pride is the recognition of the fact that you are your own
highest value and, like all of man’s values, it has to be
earned.
_Ayn Rand "ATLAS SHRUGGED"
HEMI-Powered
2008-11-01 14:34:41 UTC
Permalink
Kurt Nicklas added these comments in the current discussion du
jour ...
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Gandalf Grey
That's right, Dickless....REdistributed.
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by
government bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Get used to hearing it.
Exactly. Remember, all you Far Left Loons, that Joe the plumber
didn't see out The One, The Messiah, The Marxist, Hussein NObama
came down HIS street then blew the question and thus - finally -
described his main fiscal agenda, that of Marxism which goes even
beyond ordinary Socialism. And, it will be the downfall of Hussein
NObama in just 3 more days. God Bless America!
--
HP, aka Jerry

NOT Marxism "To each according to his needs, from each according to
his abilities" - Karl Marx from "The Communist Manifesto"
NOT Hate such as "No, no, no, not God Bless American, God DAMN
America" - Rev. Jeremy Wright
NOT hate such as Black Libaration Theology as easpoused by James
Cone

But -- No Way, No How, No Marxism, NObama!
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-01 17:20:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?

You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?

--------------------------------
"Obama is getting almost as conservative as Bill Clinton was.
Pro-death penalty, pro-Israel, anti-4th Amendment. Is that the
"change" we were looking for?"
----------- Mitchel Holloman 7/2/08
Kate
2008-11-01 19:46:02 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
Post by Kurt Nicklas
--------------------------------
"Obama is getting almost as conservative as Bill Clinton was.
Pro-death penalty, pro-Israel, anti-4th Amendment. Is that the
"change" we were looking for?"
----------- Mitchel Holloman 7/2/08
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 00:09:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Free Lunch
2008-11-02 00:39:00 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Well, Alaska is the most socialist state in the country, as we all know.
The residents of Alaska can afford to be so 'self-sufficient' because
they get a good sized check from the state every year.
Kate
2008-11-02 01:43:01 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Your question Kurtie
Mitchell Holman
2008-11-02 02:58:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by Free Lunch
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by
government bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Your question Kurtie
Kurt only asks questions, he doesn't answer them.

Just like how he only demands proof, but never
provides any.




Mitchell Holman

"Was it the fact that Bill Clinton was the first elected
president in U.S. history to be impeached. Or that he was
the first president to be found guilty of a crime while
still in office." Kurt Nicklas, 08/28/08. He has since
been unable to tell us what crime Clinton was arrested
for or convicted of.
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 08:54:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Free Lunch
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by
government bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Your question Kurtie
    I only ask questions, I don't answer them.
    Just like how I only demand proof, but never
provide any.
Mitchell Holman
Fixed it up for ya,Hollowperson.

I asked a perfectly normal question after you tripped into
the thread with an off-topic post and, like always,
in your usual defensive, evasive manner you answer my
question with a question of your own. It's your normal
pattern of behavior here, of course.
When I treated you appropriately and repeated my
question you evaded a second time.

Stay stupid, stay cowardly, Mitchel. You're not fooling
anyone.

-------------------------------------------
Mitchel Holloman on gun rights:

"What militia do you belong to and who regulates it?"
--------- 1/17/08
N***@Click.com
2008-11-02 16:07:08 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 01:54:07 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Fixed it up for ya,Hollowperson.
I asked a perfectly normal question after you tripped into
the thread with an off-topic post and, like always,
I asked a perfectly normal question when you made all
those late-night, drunken crank calls, Knickkkers

SNICKER
N***@Click.com
2008-11-02 16:08:14 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 01:54:07 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Stay stupid, stay cowardly, Mitchel. You're not fooling
anyone.
Nor did you with that name of yours on Caller ID,
Knickkkers.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHA
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 08:55:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Free Lunch
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Your question Kurtie
Snippy, aren't you? Did I catch you at the wrong time of the month?

{snickers}
Kate
2008-11-02 16:11:02 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 01:55:14 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Free Lunch
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:09:28 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 10:20:52 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
And you approve of a state tax being given directly to the people and
then you taxed for their infrastructure?
What makes you think so, Katie?
Your question Kurtie
Snippy, aren't you? Did I catch you at the wrong time of the month?
{snickers}
Wrong time of the month?

No dear, you caught me having a brain.

Come back when you have something semi-intellegent to say.
Mitchell Holman
2008-11-01 20:16:25 UTC
Permalink
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?

Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?





Michell Holman


"ALL global warming advocates are funded by the government-
university complex."
Kurt Nicklas, 06/18/07. For a sampling of the corporations
which are advocating a response to global warming go to:
http://www.net.org/warming/docs/Business_Leadership_Quotes.pdf
Mark K. Bilbo
2008-11-01 22:36:31 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:16:25 -0500 in
Post by Mitchell Holman
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?
Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?
Hugo Chavez was so impressed by Palin, he literally had tears in his
eyes...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
“The men the American people admire most
extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men
they detest most violently are those who try to
tell them the truth.”

- H. L. Mencken
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 00:10:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark K. Bilbo
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:16:25 -0500 in
Post by Mitchell Holman
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
    So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?
    Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?
Hugo Chavez was so impressed by Palin, he literally had tears in his
eyes...
The fact that he probably wasn't *should* tell you something, Blibo.

But it won't.

-------------------------

"Obama is getting almost as conservative as Bill Clinton was.
Pro-death penalty, pro-Israel, anti-4th Amendment. Is that the
"change" we were looking for?"
----------- Mitchel Holloman 7/2/08
Kate
2008-11-02 15:17:03 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Mark K. Bilbo
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:16:25 -0500 in
Post by Mitchell Holman
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
    So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?
    Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?
Hugo Chavez was so impressed by Palin, he literally had tears in his
eyes...
The fact that he probably wasn't *should* tell you something, Blibo.
But it won't.
He wasn't?

You have proof?

Face it Kurtie - it was a blatently communistic action.
Mark K. Bilbo
2008-11-03 14:51:45 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:17:03 -0600 in
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Mark K. Bilbo
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:16:25 -0500 in
news:fe1c0b97-40ea-4a79-
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by
government bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil Seattle
Times August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
    So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?
    Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?
Hugo Chavez was so impressed by Palin, he literally had tears in his
eyes...
The fact that he probably wasn't *should* tell you something, Blibo.
But it won't.
He wasn't?
You have proof?
Kurty should have that overly literal thing checked out by a qualified
mental health specialist.
Post by Kate
Face it Kurtie - it was a blatently communistic action.
Well, not really. Technically, communism wouldn't even allow for private
ownership of the means of production. There'd be a state oil company and
the alleged goal would be for the state to "wither away" and the workers
own the means of production directly.

(Ironically enough, the USSR state did "wither away", just not how Marx
expected. <g>)

And what she did isn't even really in the realm of socialism per se. Such
as European social democracy would have higher tax rates on the
corporations and use the money for social programs and infrastructure.
Such things.

What she did is more populist. Socialistic populism? And Chavez has been
doing a lot of that.

By the way--and I just found this out myself, the state of Alaska has the
most left constitution in the US. Sometimes people refer to it as "the
people's state". I mean, look at this:

http://ltgov.state.ak.us/constitution.php?section=8

Awful lot of stuff in there about common ownership and use and the state
controlling the resources for the benefit of the proletariat... I mean,
people...
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The heresy of democracy has since then worked havoc in church
and state, and it has worked towards reducing society to anarchy."
-- R.J. Rushdooney, architect of "Christian Reconstructionism."
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-03 16:00:59 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mark K. Bilbo
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 09:17:03 -0600 in
Post by Kate
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Mark K. Bilbo
On Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:16:25 -0500 in
news:fe1c0b97-40ea-4a79-
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by
government bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil Seattle
Times August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
    So you approve of taking from those who create wealth
and giving the proceeds to those who did not?
    Why....that's SOCIALISM, right?
Hugo Chavez was so impressed by Palin, he literally had tears in his
eyes...
The fact that he probably wasn't *should* tell you something, Blibo.
But it won't.
He wasn't?
You have proof?
Kurty should have that overly literal thing checked out by a qualified
mental health specialist.
Blibo says something which he can't prove, gets called on it and
suddenly he portrays it as just a joke.

You seemingly can't defend your own words and can't do it to me
directly.

What a coward you are.

Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 00:06:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Mitchell Holman
innews:MPG.2375fa33eeb8f57598
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
Hussein wants money to be taken from people by force by government
bureaucrats and given to others
who HE thinks deserve it, for some unknown reason.
That's not capitalism, Ricky-poo. That's Socialism.
Windfall tax lets Alaska rake in billions from Big Oil
Seattle Times
August 10, 2008
And?
You don't approve of big corporations being taxed, Hollowman?
    So you...<SLAP!>
Hollowman, I asked you a reasonable question after you broke into
this thread. You *know* I don't play your word games.

Just answer the question.
D***@Click.com
2008-11-01 14:42:52 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 18:20:44 -0700 (PDT), Kurt Nicklas
Post by Kurt Nicklas
The economic processes at work in capitalism cause wealth to be
created and distributed, Ricky. What Hussein and other Leftwingers
propose is forced
restribution by government fiat.
The fiat to funnel it upwards proved (again) a
disaster, Knickkkers

Just like your drunken late-nite crank calls.
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-01 17:54:18 UTC
Permalink
.
 And what was that re-distribution of wealth that Palin
did with the oil money up in Alaska?  What about that disasterous
Bridge-To-Nowhere and where she kept those Federal funds,>
.
But she canned the Bridge to Nowhere.  
Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006
9/1/2008
Hollowman, tell us again how the "Bridge" was part of a defense bill.

Can you do that for us?

{snickers}
Kurt Nicklas
2008-11-02 00:19:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by Kurt Nicklas
.
 And what was that re-distribution of wealth that Palin
did with the oil money up in Alaska?  What about that disasterous
Bridge-To-Nowhere and where she kept those Federal funds,>
.
But she canned the Bridge to Nowhere.  
Palin backed 'bridge to nowhere' in 2006
9/1/2008
Hollowman, tell us again how the "Bridge" was part of a defense bill.
Can you do that for us?
{snickers}
Lack of response duly noted......
Loading...